
(Bubbles – Seb Ulysses)
“No,” said Marcus, “Freedom is for the free. Others are to be kept in line, and exactly so. Society depends on divisions and order, each element stabilized perfectly in its harmonious relationship with all others.”
“You do not believe, then” I asked, “that everyone is the same, or must be supposed to be such, despite all evidence to the contrary, and that society thrives best as a disordered struggle?”
Marcus looked at me, startled.
“No,” I said “I see that you do not.” – “Magicians of Gor” by John Norman (p119)
I am breaking from my usual postings to make an observation. This observation is nothing more than an intellectual exercise, and I am sure will inflame the lifestylers. However, given the recent discussion of Socialism, it is on one’s mind.
Socialism as a basic definition involves a society characterized by equal access to resources for all individuals with a method of compensation based on the amount of labor expended. However, in the 20th Century, Socialism has taken on a darker definition culminating in the National Socialist movement of the Nazis, where it opposed certain nations, ethnicities and other groups that are deemed to be undesirable. Even in 2010, we enter a world where we are afraid of big government and the nationalization of certain services to the general public, all the while being enslaved to the Masters of Business.
This observation is a culmination of several theories of Gorean Philosophy and counter arguments. One notable Gorean Philosopher, Marcus of Ar, observes:
If a creature is naturally genetically superior to another, then it is considered fitting and proper that such a creature should dominate other, less developed creatures. In regards to human beings, it understood that the stronger and/or more intelligent members of the race should be allowed to assume their rightful place in command of their inferiors. In regard to male/female sexual relations, it is therefore the right of the male, who is genetically predisposed for physical dominance, to control the physical aspects of his relationship to the female. …Subjugation of the Weak: This principle acts as the inverse to the tenet described above. In order that the race may grow stronger, it is necessary that the weaker and lesser adaptive elements of Gorean society be diminished and controlled. Warfare and slavery are two methods by which this end is accomplished.
Is Gor a Socialist society? In the truest definition, yes….as each Gorean pledges to a homestone and works towards the betterment of the values it symbolizes. All castes work towards the common goal of the strength of the homestone. Another perspective would say that Gor is exemplary of the society Ayn Rand imagined. As Marcus of Ar observed:
The common Gorean belief is that strength, whether it is physical strength, mental strength, or strength of will, should be celebrated and set forth as an example. In this way the Gorean feels he advances the human race, adding to its chances for survival and continued existence.
But even in alternative definitions, Gor could be considered exemplary of the darker definitions of Socialism. After all, women are second class citizens and the slaves are viewed as inferior. Even in terms of inferiority, there are hierarchies, as the weak male kajirus is viewed as the most despicable, lowest form of being. The male kajirus is a threat and possibly even a reminder that even those in control (the Masters) are but one piece of steel away from living on their knees. This very danger of being relegated to the lower castes tends to keep everyone in Gor subservient to the overall Socialistic goal of maintaining the order of things.
Those who oppose the order are considered outlaws… rebels…. pirates…. panthers. Those who do not follow the dogma of the “Gorean Philosophy” are viewed as heretics and are sought and destroyed. Sound familiar?
This is just an observation.
January 9, 2010
Categories: Gor . Tags: Ayn Rand, Gor, Gorean, kajirus, Socialism . Author: matrixvoom1 . Comments: Leave a Comment